<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 884 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384695</link>
    <description>Refund of special additional duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. cannot be denied for a mere missing endorsement where the invoices are computer-generated, the sale price is consolidated, and the buyers confirm that no credit has been taken. The endorsement requirement under the notification operates as a procedural safeguard, not an absolute bar, when the substantive condition is otherwise met and the duty element is not separately shown in a manner that permits credit. On that basis, the refund claim was treated as valid and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 07:50:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 884 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384695</link>
      <description>Refund of special additional duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. cannot be denied for a mere missing endorsement where the invoices are computer-generated, the sale price is consolidated, and the buyers confirm that no credit has been taken. The endorsement requirement under the notification operates as a procedural safeguard, not an absolute bar, when the substantive condition is otherwise met and the duty element is not separately shown in a manner that permits credit. On that basis, the refund claim was treated as valid and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>