<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1455 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order under Section 154 and upholding the original order that deleted the addition made by the AO on account of long-term capital gain. The Tribunal found the reference to the DVO invalid under Section 55A as it existed during the relevant assessment year and deemed the issue too debatable for rectification proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1455 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order under Section 154 and upholding the original order that deleted the addition made by the AO on account of long-term capital gain. The Tribunal found the reference to the DVO invalid under Section 55A as it existed during the relevant assessment year and deemed the issue too debatable for rectification proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>