<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1200 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to refer the matter to the District Valuation Officer under Section 55A of the Income Tax Act when the value claimed by the assessee was not less than the fair market value. The Tribunal accepted the valuation by the registered valuer as fair and reasonable, rejecting the reliance on the DVO&#039;s report. The decision was rendered on 10-09-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1200 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to refer the matter to the District Valuation Officer under Section 55A of the Income Tax Act when the value claimed by the assessee was not less than the fair market value. The Tribunal accepted the valuation by the registered valuer as fair and reasonable, rejecting the reliance on the DVO&#039;s report. The decision was rendered on 10-09-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>