<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1118 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross-Objection, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that rectification under section 154 was not appropriate for the debatable issue of allowing the firm&#039;s losses for book profit calculation under section 115JB. The Tribunal held that the firm&#039;s losses could be considered for book profit computation, in line with section 72A(vi) read with section 47(xiii). Both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the Cross-Objection were ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1118 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross-Objection, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that rectification under section 154 was not appropriate for the debatable issue of allowing the firm&#039;s losses for book profit calculation under section 115JB. The Tribunal held that the firm&#039;s losses could be considered for book profit computation, in line with section 72A(vi) read with section 47(xiii). Both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the Cross-Objection were ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>