<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19413</link>
    <description>Payment of meher by a husband to his wife was treated as a payment for consideration, not a transfer without consideration, so property acquired by the wife out of that amount was not includible in the husband&#039;s net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act. The same meher amount could also not be characterised as a recoverable debt due from the wife, and therefore could not be brought into the husband&#039;s net wealth as a liability or asset. Both referred questions were answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19413</link>
      <description>Payment of meher by a husband to his wife was treated as a payment for consideration, not a transfer without consideration, so property acquired by the wife out of that amount was not includible in the husband&#039;s net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act. The same meher amount could also not be characterised as a recoverable debt due from the wife, and therefore could not be brought into the husband&#039;s net wealth as a liability or asset. Both referred questions were answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>