<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 858 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384669</link>
    <description>A pre-GST works contract that continued after GST came into force had to be quantified under the post-GST framework and the applicable Government Order. The court noted that the relevant works-contract service attracted 12% GST under the CGST regime, and that the State Government Order already in force required the original contract value to be adjusted after identifying the subsumed tax component and then adding GST as applicable. The parties were therefore directed to complete the quantification exercise on that basis, while the ongoing work continued uninterrupted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 858 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384669</link>
      <description>A pre-GST works contract that continued after GST came into force had to be quantified under the post-GST framework and the applicable Government Order. The court noted that the relevant works-contract service attracted 12% GST under the CGST regime, and that the State Government Order already in force required the original contract value to be adjusted after identifying the subsumed tax component and then adding GST as applicable. The parties were therefore directed to complete the quantification exercise on that basis, while the ongoing work continued uninterrupted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>