<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 842 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the matters for the AO to recompute in line with its directions and relevant judicial precedents. The expenditure was treated as pre-operative pending capitalization, disallowances under Section 14A were to be recalculated, and book profit under Section 115JB was to be recomputed without reliance on Section 14A read with Rule 8D, following the ITAT Special Bench decision. The order was pronounced on 09/08/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:26:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 842 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the matters for the AO to recompute in line with its directions and relevant judicial precedents. The expenditure was treated as pre-operative pending capitalization, disallowances under Section 14A were to be recalculated, and book profit under Section 115JB was to be recomputed without reliance on Section 14A read with Rule 8D, following the ITAT Special Bench decision. The order was pronounced on 09/08/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>