<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 836 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of additions of Rs. 20,00,000 and Rs. 71,600, admitting additional evidence, and remanding the issue of Rs. 20,65,692 and the double addition of Rs. 8,05,677 back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The charging of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was considered consequential and did not require separate adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 836 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of additions of Rs. 20,00,000 and Rs. 71,600, admitting additional evidence, and remanding the issue of Rs. 20,65,692 and the double addition of Rs. 8,05,677 back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The charging of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was considered consequential and did not require separate adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>