<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Best Judgement Assessment Should Use 3.5% Average Rate for Income Estimation u/s 144.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48763</link>
    <description>Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 - estimation of income @12 or 8% - keeping in mind the judicial guideline available on issue, that after rejection of accounts, the income of the assessee is to be estimated on some reasonable basis for which comparable case and history of the assessee can be taken as a guide - it is fair, reasonable and logical to apply an average rate of two earlier years(@3.5%)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:58:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Best Judgement Assessment Should Use 3.5% Average Rate for Income Estimation u/s 144.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48763</link>
      <description>Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 - estimation of income @12 or 8% - keeping in mind the judicial guideline available on issue, that after rejection of accounts, the income of the assessee is to be estimated on some reasonable basis for which comparable case and history of the assessee can be taken as a guide - it is fair, reasonable and logical to apply an average rate of two earlier years(@3.5%)</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 07:58:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>