https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282690 A general difficulty-removal order issued to implement GST in pending works contracts was held valid under the tender statute, because the original bid conditions already contemplated adjustment of tax differences if GST came into force during execution. The Court found that requiring existing contractors to negotiate and execute supplemental agreements did not exceed the statutory power, since the order operated generally and did not itself impose a final contractual alteration. The challenge on jurisdiction and natural justice therefore failed, as the measure did not prejudice contractors or deny a hearing before any supplemental agreement was concluded. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282690 A general difficulty-removal order issued to implement GST in pending works contracts was held valid under the tender statute, because the original bid conditions already contemplated adjustment of tax differences if GST came into force during execution. The Court found that requiring existing contractors to negotiate and execute supplemental agreements did not exceed the statutory power, since the order operated generally and did not itself impose a final contractual alteration. The challenge on jurisdiction and natural justice therefore failed, as the measure did not prejudice contractors or deny a hearing before any supplemental agreement was concluded. Case-Laws GST Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282690