<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify the correctness of the claims under Section 54F. The matter was referred back to the AO to examine the nature of the investments and provide the appellants with an opportunity to furnish necessary details. The appeals were allowed with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:28:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=584017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the AO to verify the correctness of the claims under Section 54F. The matter was referred back to the AO to examine the nature of the investments and provide the appellants with an opportunity to furnish necessary details. The appeals were allowed with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>