<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 68 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19401</link>
    <description>Immunity under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976 is confined to the declarant, and does not extend to another assessee whose books contain a corresponding credit entry. The partner&#039;s disclosure therefore did not prevent the income-tax authorities from examining the genuineness and source of the credit in the firm&#039;s assessment. Sections 8 and 18 were read as limiting the benefit, concession and immunity to the person who made the voluntary disclosure. Applying earlier Supreme Court authorities on similar disclosure schemes, the court held that the revenue may independently investigate whether the credit is explained and treat it as unexplained if the explanation fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 68 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19401</link>
      <description>Immunity under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976 is confined to the declarant, and does not extend to another assessee whose books contain a corresponding credit entry. The partner&#039;s disclosure therefore did not prevent the income-tax authorities from examining the genuineness and source of the credit in the firm&#039;s assessment. Sections 8 and 18 were read as limiting the benefit, concession and immunity to the person who made the voluntary disclosure. Applying earlier Supreme Court authorities on similar disclosure schemes, the court held that the revenue may independently investigate whether the credit is explained and treat it as unexplained if the explanation fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>