<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1473 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 41 lakhs as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity and creditworthiness of the creditor, BMPL, and the transactions were genuine. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 17.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2019 08:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1473 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 41 lakhs as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity and creditworthiness of the creditor, BMPL, and the transactions were genuine. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 17.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>