<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1627 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding late EPF payment. The Tribunal considered that although there was a delay in depositing the EPF contributions, they were made before filing the income tax return. Citing the judgment in CIT vs. Hemla Embroydery Mills (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal held that the second proviso to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act operated retrospectively, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2019 08:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1627 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding late EPF payment. The Tribunal considered that although there was a delay in depositing the EPF contributions, they were made before filing the income tax return. Citing the judgment in CIT vs. Hemla Embroydery Mills (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal held that the second proviso to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act operated retrospectively, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>