<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1738 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282670</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the Assessee&#039;s exempt income. The Appeal was partially allowed, reversing the Tribunal&#039;s decision to limit the disallowance to the amount of exempt income earned by the Assessee. The Court emphasized the need for a rational nexus between expenses and income earned, in line with previous High Court judgments on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1738 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282670</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the Assessee&#039;s exempt income. The Appeal was partially allowed, reversing the Tribunal&#039;s decision to limit the disallowance to the amount of exempt income earned by the Assessee. The Court emphasized the need for a rational nexus between expenses and income earned, in line with previous High Court judgments on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>