https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19391 Writ petitions challenging reassessment notices under the Income-tax Act, 1961 were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy was available. The petitioners could file replies to the notices and, if reassessment orders were later passed, pursue the appellate remedies under the Act. As the controversy involved disputed questions of fact, the High Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under article 226 and left the parties to the statutory framework. en-us Wed, 31 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:09:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19391 Writ petitions challenging reassessment notices under the Income-tax Act, 1961 were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy was available. The petitioners could file replies to the notices and, if reassessment orders were later passed, pursue the appellate remedies under the Act. As the controversy involved disputed questions of fact, the High Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under article 226 and left the parties to the statutory framework. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 31 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19391