<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 771 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to give the assessee a final opportunity to produce parties to substantiate unexplained cash deposits. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was canceled due to the restoration of the quantum addition issue, allowing fresh penalty proceedings post-assessment. The judgment stressed the need for due process and substantiation of claims, emphasizing proper adherence to legal procedures in tax assessments and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 771 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to give the assessee a final opportunity to produce parties to substantiate unexplained cash deposits. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was canceled due to the restoration of the quantum addition issue, allowing fresh penalty proceedings post-assessment. The judgment stressed the need for due process and substantiation of claims, emphasizing proper adherence to legal procedures in tax assessments and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>