<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 759 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384570</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras addressed the appeal regarding the interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; for CENVAT credit of service tax on transportation charges incurred by a manufacturer. The Court noted Supreme Court judgments emphasizing that tax paid on transportation of final products to a specific point should be allowed. After considering arguments, the High Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal to reevaluate in light of Supreme Court decisions. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 07:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 759 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384570</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras addressed the appeal regarding the interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; for CENVAT credit of service tax on transportation charges incurred by a manufacturer. The Court noted Supreme Court judgments emphasizing that tax paid on transportation of final products to a specific point should be allowed. After considering arguments, the High Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal to reevaluate in light of Supreme Court decisions. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>