<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 755 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s insistence on payment of 30% of the disputed demand as a condition for stay was held prejudicial where the pending appeal disclosed an arguable case. The Court did not examine the merits of the statutory appeal, but found that the onerous interim payment condition could be interfered with to protect the appellant&#039;s position. Recovery of the disputed amount was therefore deferred, and the Tribunal was directed to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 755 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s insistence on payment of 30% of the disputed demand as a condition for stay was held prejudicial where the pending appeal disclosed an arguable case. The Court did not examine the merits of the statutory appeal, but found that the onerous interim payment condition could be interfered with to protect the appellant&#039;s position. Recovery of the disputed amount was therefore deferred, and the Tribunal was directed to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>