<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 752 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384563</link>
    <description>CBDT&#039;s circular enhancing monetary limits for departmental appeals was treated as a modification of the existing litigation policy, so the retrospective wording in the earlier circular continued to apply to pending as well as future appeals. Revenue appeals falling below the prescribed tax-effect threshold were therefore not maintainable and were treated as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2020 20:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 752 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384563</link>
      <description>CBDT&#039;s circular enhancing monetary limits for departmental appeals was treated as a modification of the existing litigation policy, so the retrospective wording in the earlier circular continued to apply to pending as well as future appeals. Revenue appeals falling below the prescribed tax-effect threshold were therefore not maintainable and were treated as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>