<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 750 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384561</link>
    <description>The court directed the Revenue Counsel to forward the communication to the second respondent and instructed a suitable reply within 10 days. The court disposed of the writ petition without costs, emphasizing the lack of Customs Department involvement with the private respondents and addressing the payment dispute and communication issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 07:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 750 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384561</link>
      <description>The court directed the Revenue Counsel to forward the communication to the second respondent and instructed a suitable reply within 10 days. The court disposed of the writ petition without costs, emphasizing the lack of Customs Department involvement with the private respondents and addressing the payment dispute and communication issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>