<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1797 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) due to procedural defects in the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the charge violated principles of natural justice, setting aside the penalty proceedings and rendering the Revenue&#039;s appeal academic. The order was pronounced on March 28, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1797 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the penalty by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) due to procedural defects in the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the charge violated principles of natural justice, setting aside the penalty proceedings and rendering the Revenue&#039;s appeal academic. The order was pronounced on March 28, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>