<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 34 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19385</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the Appellate Tribunal erred in applying outdated legal principles from a previous case. The Court emphasized the need to consider the current legal standards post the introduction of the Explanation in 1964. The decision was made without imposing any costs, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1964-65 was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:55:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 34 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19385</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the Appellate Tribunal erred in applying outdated legal principles from a previous case. The Court emphasized the need to consider the current legal standards post the introduction of the Explanation in 1964. The decision was made without imposing any costs, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1964-65 was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>