<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1257 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282643</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the refunded amount as per the provisions of Section 42 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The writ petitions were allowed, directing the calculation and payment of interest within a specified timeline, with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1257 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282643</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the refunded amount as per the provisions of Section 42 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The writ petitions were allowed, directing the calculation and payment of interest within a specified timeline, with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>