<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Case: Revenue Misses Timely Info Check, Later Accuses Importer of Fact Suppression; Highlights Need for Prompt Action.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48691</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts - The Revenue had all resources and opportunities in 2013 to either know from the importer all the technical information that they required. Since Revenue have not done so, in 2016 they cannot make allegation that importer did not provide them all the information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:33:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:33:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Case: Revenue Misses Timely Info Check, Later Accuses Importer of Fact Suppression; Highlights Need for Prompt Action.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48691</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts - The Revenue had all resources and opportunities in 2013 to either know from the importer all the technical information that they required. Since Revenue have not done so, in 2016 they cannot make allegation that importer did not provide them all the information.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:33:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>