<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 372 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282638</link>
    <description>Reliable eyewitness evidence, especially the testimony of an injured witness whose presence was undisputed and whose version was promptly recorded in the FIR, supported the prosecution case, and corroboration from other eyewitnesses was accepted. The Court also noted that the finding on participation of each accused was properly examined. However, the medical evidence did not show internal damage to vital organs, and the doctor did not state that the injuries were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. On that basis, the common object was treated as causing beatings rather than murder, and the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 was replaced by conviction under Section 304 Part II, while the other convictions and sentences were confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 372 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282638</link>
      <description>Reliable eyewitness evidence, especially the testimony of an injured witness whose presence was undisputed and whose version was promptly recorded in the FIR, supported the prosecution case, and corroboration from other eyewitnesses was accepted. The Court also noted that the finding on participation of each accused was properly examined. However, the medical evidence did not show internal damage to vital organs, and the doctor did not state that the injuries were sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. On that basis, the common object was treated as causing beatings rather than murder, and the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 was replaced by conviction under Section 304 Part II, while the other convictions and sentences were confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>