<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19381</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the Commissioner to reevaluate the application for penalty waiver considering genuine hardship and cooperation, rather than solely focusing on penalty payment as grounds for rejection. The court emphasized that relief under section 273A(4) should be based on mitigating circumstances, not just penalty payment, and clarified that even if the penalty is paid, the assessee may still be eligible for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:43:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19381</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order, and directed the Commissioner to reevaluate the application for penalty waiver considering genuine hardship and cooperation, rather than solely focusing on penalty payment as grounds for rejection. The court emphasized that relief under section 273A(4) should be based on mitigating circumstances, not just penalty payment, and clarified that even if the penalty is paid, the assessee may still be eligible for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>