<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Condones 655-Day Appeal Delay Due to Work-from-Home Employee&#039;s Negligence u/s 273B.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48668</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay of 655 days - negligence of an employee - mistake of employee working at residence appears to be reasonable and comes within the meaning of reasonable cause, as provided u/s 273B - a litigant does not stand to benefit by filing an appeal late, rather it creates undue hardship to the litigant, because of tax demand - delay condoned</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:57:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Condones 655-Day Appeal Delay Due to Work-from-Home Employee&#039;s Negligence u/s 273B.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48668</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay of 655 days - negligence of an employee - mistake of employee working at residence appears to be reasonable and comes within the meaning of reasonable cause, as provided u/s 273B - a litigant does not stand to benefit by filing an appeal late, rather it creates undue hardship to the litigant, because of tax demand - delay condoned</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:57:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>