<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 727 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384538</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 could not be sustained where the recorded reasons related to matters already pending in appeal, because the proviso excludes income forming the subject matter of appellate, revisional, or reference proceedings. The tribunal also applied binding High Court rulings that electricity duty and allied statutory amounts held by the assessee were not disallowable under section 43B as a liability payable to the sovereign in a fiduciary capacity, and that section 115JB did not apply to a statutory corporation not treated as a company under the Companies Act. The reopening and the additions were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 727 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384538</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 could not be sustained where the recorded reasons related to matters already pending in appeal, because the proviso excludes income forming the subject matter of appellate, revisional, or reference proceedings. The tribunal also applied binding High Court rulings that electricity duty and allied statutory amounts held by the assessee were not disallowable under section 43B as a liability payable to the sovereign in a fiduciary capacity, and that section 115JB did not apply to a statutory corporation not treated as a company under the Companies Act. The reopening and the additions were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>