<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 709 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384520</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere because the matter involved only the tax effect. The special leave petition was dismissed, and any pending applications stood disposed of. The order reflects that the Court did not enter into the merits of the underlying income tax dispute and treated the tax effect as decisive for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 709 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384520</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere because the matter involved only the tax effect. The special leave petition was dismissed, and any pending applications stood disposed of. The order reflects that the Court did not enter into the merits of the underlying income tax dispute and treated the tax effect as decisive for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>