<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 58 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19373</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the lack of jurisdiction to levy penalties on disrupted Hindu undivided families under the relevant provisions of the Act, leading to the justification of penalty cancellation in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:04:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 58 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19373</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The judgment emphasized the lack of jurisdiction to levy penalties on disrupted Hindu undivided families under the relevant provisions of the Act, leading to the justification of penalty cancellation in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>