https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384506 The court directed the respondents to provide the petitioner with a personal hearing and proceed with the adjudication without interfering with the show-cause notice or the Seizure Mahazar. The court emphasized that interference in writ jurisdiction is not warranted unless the notice is wholly without jurisdiction or illegal. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, allowing the processing of the application for provisional release under Section 110-A of the Customs Act 1962. No costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:49:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384506 The court directed the respondents to provide the petitioner with a personal hearing and proceed with the adjudication without interfering with the show-cause notice or the Seizure Mahazar. The court emphasized that interference in writ jurisdiction is not warranted unless the notice is wholly without jurisdiction or illegal. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, allowing the processing of the application for provisional release under Section 110-A of the Customs Act 1962. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384506