<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 688 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under Customs Tariff heading 8504, rejecting the importer&#039;s initial claim under heading 8537. Allegations of suppression of information by the importer were dismissed as the Tribunal found no evidence of suppression during the classification process. The Tribunal allowed the importer&#039;s appeals against significant duty demands raised by the Department, setting aside duties and penalties. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting suppression allegations, granting consequential relief to the importer based on proper classification procedures followed in 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 688 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under Customs Tariff heading 8504, rejecting the importer&#039;s initial claim under heading 8537. Allegations of suppression of information by the importer were dismissed as the Tribunal found no evidence of suppression during the classification process. The Tribunal allowed the importer&#039;s appeals against significant duty demands raised by the Department, setting aside duties and penalties. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting suppression allegations, granting consequential relief to the importer based on proper classification procedures followed in 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>