https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384489 The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the CESTAT order regarding the exemption of National Calamity Contingent Duty on captively consumed yarns. The Court held that the Supreme Court's ratio applied to the case, eliminating the need for the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of relevant legal precedents, including a Supreme Court judgment in a similar case, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the petitioner. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384489 The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the CESTAT order regarding the exemption of National Calamity Contingent Duty on captively consumed yarns. The Court held that the Supreme Court's ratio applied to the case, eliminating the need for the petitioner to pursue an alternative remedy. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of relevant legal precedents, including a Supreme Court judgment in a similar case, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384489