https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384484 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal and disposed of the assessee's Cross Objection, upholding the Ld. Commissioner's decision to set aside the central excise duty demand. The Tribunal emphasized the system error in the ER-4 return and accepted the CENVAT Credit Register corresponding to the ER-1 return. It found no need to remand the matter due to limitations and lack of suppression, ruling in favor of the assessee. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2019 07:48:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384484 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal and disposed of the assessee's Cross Objection, upholding the Ld. Commissioner's decision to set aside the central excise duty demand. The Tribunal emphasized the system error in the ER-4 return and accepted the CENVAT Credit Register corresponding to the ER-1 return. It found no need to remand the matter due to limitations and lack of suppression, ruling in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384484