<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384479</link>
    <description>Attachment of a company&#039;s bank account for recovery of a director&#039;s unpaid penalty under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was addressed by balancing the company&#039;s separate juristic status against the Revenue&#039;s power to attach monies due or becoming due to the dealer. The tax liability under the revised assessment had already been discharged, but the penalty component remained unpaid. Relief was made conditional on payment of part of the penalty, credit for the amount already recovered, and security for the balance by personal bond. The attachment was to be raised on compliance, with automatic revival if the underlying penalty order was not challenged within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384479</link>
      <description>Attachment of a company&#039;s bank account for recovery of a director&#039;s unpaid penalty under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was addressed by balancing the company&#039;s separate juristic status against the Revenue&#039;s power to attach monies due or becoming due to the dealer. The tax liability under the revised assessment had already been discharged, but the penalty component remained unpaid. Relief was made conditional on payment of part of the penalty, credit for the amount already recovered, and security for the balance by personal bond. The attachment was to be raised on compliance, with automatic revival if the underlying penalty order was not challenged within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>