<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1916 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282619</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh held that the petition falls under its jurisdiction due to the debtor&#039;s registered office location. Ludhiana Scrips Pvt. Ltd. was found ineligible as a financial creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code as the disbursed amount lacked consideration for the time value of money. The judgment clarified the definitions of &quot;financial creditor&quot; and &quot;financial debt&quot; under the Code, emphasizing the need for consideration for the time value of money. The compromise agreement was deemed invalid as the petitioner failed to prove the nature of the original disbursement, resulting in the rejection of the insolvency resolution process application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1916 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282619</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh held that the petition falls under its jurisdiction due to the debtor&#039;s registered office location. Ludhiana Scrips Pvt. Ltd. was found ineligible as a financial creditor under Section 7 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code as the disbursed amount lacked consideration for the time value of money. The judgment clarified the definitions of &quot;financial creditor&quot; and &quot;financial debt&quot; under the Code, emphasizing the need for consideration for the time value of money. The compromise agreement was deemed invalid as the petitioner failed to prove the nature of the original disbursement, resulting in the rejection of the insolvency resolution process application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>