<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384471</link>
    <description>SC affirmed that the requirement of notice under section 143(2) is mandatory and, while section 292BB can cure infirmities in service where the assessee participated, it cannot validate a complete absence of notice. Applying Blue Moon precedent, the Court held that 292BB only deems defective service valid if a departmental notice existed; since no 143(2) notice was ever issued, the HC and Tribunal&#039;s quashing of the assessment was correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384471</link>
      <description>SC affirmed that the requirement of notice under section 143(2) is mandatory and, while section 292BB can cure infirmities in service where the assessee participated, it cannot validate a complete absence of notice. Applying Blue Moon precedent, the Court held that 292BB only deems defective service valid if a departmental notice existed; since no 143(2) notice was ever issued, the HC and Tribunal&#039;s quashing of the assessment was correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>