<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 649 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that as there were no real cash transactions involved in the issuance of shares at a premium, the question of unexplained cash credit did not arise, thereby justifying the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 07:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 649 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that as there were no real cash transactions involved in the issuance of shares at a premium, the question of unexplained cash credit did not arise, thereby justifying the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>