<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 646 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384457</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 regarding Transfer Pricing Adjustment and Non-Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of 4 comparable entities in Transfer Pricing Adjustment to align mean margins within the tolerance range, based on various Tribunal decisions supporting their exclusion due to different business models. In Non-Transfer Pricing Adjustment, the Tribunal deleted the adhoc disallowance of 20% of communication expenses, following a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor. The appeal was partly allowed, with the levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings deemed mandatory and premature respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 646 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384457</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 regarding Transfer Pricing Adjustment and Non-Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of 4 comparable entities in Transfer Pricing Adjustment to align mean margins within the tolerance range, based on various Tribunal decisions supporting their exclusion due to different business models. In Non-Transfer Pricing Adjustment, the Tribunal deleted the adhoc disallowance of 20% of communication expenses, following a previous decision in the assessee&#039;s favor. The appeal was partly allowed, with the levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings deemed mandatory and premature respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>