<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 56 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19355</link>
    <description>Exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act applies only to the deceased&#039;s own share in property passing on death. In coparcenary or Hindu undivided family property, the share of lineal descendants is not covered by that exemption. For rate purposes under section 34(1)(c), that share must be aggregated with the principal value of the estate. The Court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view and answered the question against the assessee, in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 56 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19355</link>
      <description>Exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act applies only to the deceased&#039;s own share in property passing on death. In coparcenary or Hindu undivided family property, the share of lineal descendants is not covered by that exemption. For rate purposes under section 34(1)(c), that share must be aggregated with the principal value of the estate. The Court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view and answered the question against the assessee, in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>