https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282583 An application under section 151 CPC to reopen a dismissal of suit is not itself appealable under section 104 or Order 43, Rule 1, and does not fall within the appeal scheme for dismissal orders under Order 9, Rule 9. Once a dismissal order is drawn up and filed, the trial court cannot alter or reconsider it except to correct a discrepancy between the pronounced and recorded order. A delayed request to set aside dismissal for default is governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act, 1908 and is barred after thirty days, with section 5 offering no relief on these facts. No fresh notice was required before the suit was relisted in the special list. en-us Fri, 22 May 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:19:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282583 An application under section 151 CPC to reopen a dismissal of suit is not itself appealable under section 104 or Order 43, Rule 1, and does not fall within the appeal scheme for dismissal orders under Order 9, Rule 9. Once a dismissal order is drawn up and filed, the trial court cannot alter or reconsider it except to correct a discrepancy between the pronounced and recorded order. A delayed request to set aside dismissal for default is governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act, 1908 and is barred after thirty days, with section 5 offering no relief on these facts. No fresh notice was required before the suit was relisted in the special list. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 May 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282583