https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282579 A contempt petition was held maintainable despite the limitation objection under Section 20 because the alleged non-compliance was treated as a continuing failure to implement clear directions, and no stay had been obtained against the operative judgment. The Court also held that the respondents willfully disobeyed the earlier order by failing to record the petitioner's actual cultivatory possession in the revenue records, instead continuing to treat the land as banjar and reflecting the Gaon Sabha. Drawing an adverse inference from missing records for crucial years, the Court found deliberate non-implementation in letter and spirit and held the respondents guilty of contempt. en-us Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:04:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282579 A contempt petition was held maintainable despite the limitation objection under Section 20 because the alleged non-compliance was treated as a continuing failure to implement clear directions, and no stay had been obtained against the operative judgment. The Court also held that the respondents willfully disobeyed the earlier order by failing to record the petitioner's actual cultivatory possession in the revenue records, instead continuing to treat the land as banjar and reflecting the Gaon Sabha. Drawing an adverse inference from missing records for crucial years, the Court found deliberate non-implementation in letter and spirit and held the respondents guilty of contempt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282579