https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282580 Section 340 CrPC was discussed as a mechanism the court may invoke in the interest of justice, and the text notes that initiation is not confined to a formal complaint by a party, so a stranger's locus standi was not treated as a bar to consideration. It also states that inconsistent or changing submissions by counsel or a public prosecutor during criminal proceedings do not, by themselves, amount to fabrication of evidence or an offence under Section 195 CrPC. On that reasoning, the complaint was described as misconceived because the alleged contradictory stands did not justify inquiry or prosecution under Section 340. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:04:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282580 Section 340 CrPC was discussed as a mechanism the court may invoke in the interest of justice, and the text notes that initiation is not confined to a formal complaint by a party, so a stranger's locus standi was not treated as a bar to consideration. It also states that inconsistent or changing submissions by counsel or a public prosecutor during criminal proceedings do not, by themselves, amount to fabrication of evidence or an offence under Section 195 CrPC. On that reasoning, the complaint was described as misconceived because the alleged contradictory stands did not justify inquiry or prosecution under Section 340. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282580