https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282578 Section 115 CPC was construed as barring revision only against interim, non-appealable orders made in the course of a suit or other proceeding. A final appellate order passed in an appeal under Section 104 or Order 43 Rule 1(r) was treated as the operative order and not as an order made in the course of the underlying suit, so the proviso to Section 115(1) did not apply. The amendment was read as not abolishing revision against such final appellate orders where the statutory conditions for revision are otherwise met. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282578 Section 115 CPC was construed as barring revision only against interim, non-appealable orders made in the course of a suit or other proceeding. A final appellate order passed in an appeal under Section 104 or Order 43 Rule 1(r) was treated as the operative order and not as an order made in the course of the underlying suit, so the proviso to Section 115(1) did not apply. The amendment was read as not abolishing revision against such final appellate orders where the statutory conditions for revision are otherwise met. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282578