<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 40 - FEDERAL COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282575</link>
    <description>The Federal Court upheld the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court, confirming that the company was properly impleaded as a plaintiff in the suit. It was determined that when directors act mala fide or beyond their powers, and their personal interests conflict with their duty, the majority of shareholders can sue in the company&#039;s name. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the High Court, with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 40 - FEDERAL COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282575</link>
      <description>The Federal Court upheld the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court, confirming that the company was properly impleaded as a plaintiff in the suit. It was determined that when directors act mala fide or beyond their powers, and their personal interests conflict with their duty, the majority of shareholders can sue in the company&#039;s name. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the High Court, with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>