https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282573 The judge dismissed the application to vary an order that had been settled and approved by both parties' solicitors, emphasizing the importance of settling orders and raising objections promptly. The judge ruled that the order should not be amended, maintaining that the ownership and title dispute over the account books and documents should be preserved. The judge decided that the account books and documents would remain with the Receivers, allowing the defendant access for business purposes until the trial to protect both parties' interests. Costs were to be borne by the parties. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:21:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282573 The judge dismissed the application to vary an order that had been settled and approved by both parties' solicitors, emphasizing the importance of settling orders and raising objections promptly. The judge ruled that the order should not be amended, maintaining that the ownership and title dispute over the account books and documents should be preserved. The judge decided that the account books and documents would remain with the Receivers, allowing the defendant access for business purposes until the trial to protect both parties' interests. Costs were to be borne by the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Feb 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282573