<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 399 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282571</link>
    <description>Section 108(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956 treats the period for delivering a stamped transfer deed as directory rather than mandatory; delayed delivery does not invalidate a transfer when the company accepts and acts upon the instrument. Article 8 of the articles of association independently permits transfers between existing members or specified relatives without invoking Article 7&#039;s pre-emption procedure. Allegations that a transfer was intended to defeat a spouse&#039;s separate claim were not material where that claim was already pending in separate proceedings. The petition and related application were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:12:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 399 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282571</link>
      <description>Section 108(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956 treats the period for delivering a stamped transfer deed as directory rather than mandatory; delayed delivery does not invalidate a transfer when the company accepts and acts upon the instrument. Article 8 of the articles of association independently permits transfers between existing members or specified relatives without invoking Article 7&#039;s pre-emption procedure. Allegations that a transfer was intended to defeat a spouse&#039;s separate claim were not material where that claim was already pending in separate proceedings. The petition and related application were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>