<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 613 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384424</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the exchange difference due to the conversion of FCNR loans into INR loans is a revenue expenditure allowable under section 37 of the Act. The provisions of section 43A were deemed not applicable as the assets were purchased domestically, and the nature of the expenditure was considered revenue, not capital. The appeal was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 9th August 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=583488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 613 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384424</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the exchange difference due to the conversion of FCNR loans into INR loans is a revenue expenditure allowable under section 37 of the Act. The provisions of section 43A were deemed not applicable as the assets were purchased domestically, and the nature of the expenditure was considered revenue, not capital. The appeal was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 9th August 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>