https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384411 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning Service Tax liability on remuneration paid to a director under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal found that the remuneration, including perquisites, paid to the Managing Director was for routine work as an employee and not for consultation services. Citing Section 65(44)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994, and relevant case law, the Tribunal held that the exclusion for services provided by an employee to the employer applied, ultimately setting aside the Service Tax liability and granting consequential relief. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384411 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning Service Tax liability on remuneration paid to a director under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal found that the remuneration, including perquisites, paid to the Managing Director was for routine work as an employee and not for consultation services. Citing Section 65(44)(b) of the Finance Act, 1994, and relevant case law, the Tribunal held that the exclusion for services provided by an employee to the employer applied, ultimately setting aside the Service Tax liability and granting consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=384411